Editorial policy
A claim needs two independent public sources before I treat it as established. A project page that repeats itself in three languages is still one source. If the sources disagree, I keep both figures and both dates. If nobody published a number, the cell stays empty.
What counts as a source
I use project sites, Blizzard's pages, the shop, support articles, GitHub repositories, news write-ups, and public videos. Titles, descriptions, and the date on the page are the evidence. A forum thread is context, not a patch note. I read those pages on the open web.
The status column says 3 sources, 2 sources, or project-reported · 1 source. I do not write a denial sentence in place of that count. The checked date on the page is the day I opened the links, 2026-11-04 for this version of the guide.
Corrections
Send the page URL and the better source to [email protected]. I would rather change a cell than defend a stale one. Prices and version numbers move. The US subscription figures are the shop's figures on the checked date, not a promise for next month.
Each page ends with one limitation sentence. That sentence is the whole boundary. I do not scatter extra disclaimers through the opening paragraph.
Questions people ask
| Do you test inside the game? | The limitation on each page says the check is the public record. Source counts are the status. |
|---|---|
| What if two sites disagree? | Both numbers stay, with their dates. I do not average them. |
| Can a project quote itself twice? | Three language homes of the same site count as one project report. |
| How do I ask for a correction? | Email [email protected]. |
Related guides
Sources
- Blizzard support — checked 2026-11-04
- Contact — checked 2026-11-04
How we check: two independent public sources, or we label a single project report. Editorial policy.
Last updated: 2026-11-04.